Qualifications of literary–written language of Kievan Ruś:
historiography of an intricate question
Ihar Klimaŭ
In
article for the first time on the bibliographic sources the history of views
and qualifications of literary–written language of Kievan Ruś is
considered. It is ascertained that traditional view saw there only the Old
Church Slavic language, borrowed from southern Slavs. This language had an
admixture of East Slavic speech elements, unequal in various scripts and
genres. But then in the USSR in 1930—40–th there was a treatment which emphasized
primacy and indigenity of East Slavic speech in old scripts, approving
existence of Old Ruśian language. The author points out that the principal
ground for such treatment were mainly manipulations with a material very
selectively taken from ancient texts. This treatment groundless recognized that
during an epoch of Kievan Ruś East Slavs had great culture and advanced writing.
Such indigenous theory has been actively accepted and then supported by Stalin
authority which it possibly itself inspired. However after Stalin’s death the
faults and shortcomings of this theory already could be criticized public
since this treatment generated too many problems. Nevertheless during Soviet
time very little scientists divided an opposite view according to which
literary–written language of Kievan Ruś
was Old Church Slavic. Efforts of the majority of the Soviet scientists
have been directed on correcting of the theory with the purpose it to save and
/ or adapt for the new facts. The theories offered by Vinogradov, Vinokur and
Jefimov, Uspenskij, and Larin which inherently represented a compromise between
a science and patriotic ideology relate to such efforts. All similar
theoretical constructions unfortunately were based on too narrow and selective
base of proofs. Despite of decades of intensive searches evidently the
traditional view that only the Old Church Slavic is literary–written language
of Kievan Ruś remains most close to the facts. However unbiassed research
in this field is complicated by myths and speculations created during the
Stalin era.